New Poll from ReThink911.org Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories
Sep 10, 2013 | 1683 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

New Poll from ReThink911.org Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories

One in Two Surveyed Have Doubts About Government's Account of 9/11; 46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 after Viewing Video Footage of Collapse

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend

ReThink911 features this Times Square billboard and other ads and events in 12 cities around the world. The campaign calls for a new investigation into the collapse of Building 7 and the twin towers.

The evidence of controlled demolition is overwhelming. As more and more people learn about Building 7, public demand for a new investigation grows. People want the truth.

Richard Gage, AIA, Founder, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

New York, NY (PRWEB) September 09, 2013

On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.

The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, “Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11?”

Among the poll’s findings:

  •     38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it;
  •     46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7’s collapse, only 19% know the building’s name;
  •     After seeing video footage of Building 7's collapse:

➢    46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who say fires caused it, and 27% who don't know;

➢    By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7's collapse, compared to 22% who oppose it.

“The poll shows quite clearly what we already knew. Most people who see Building 7’s collapse have trouble believing that fires brought it down,” said Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the campaign’s major sponsor. “It simply doesn’t look like a natural building collapse, and that’s because all the columns have been removed at once to allow it to come down symmetrically in free-fall. The evidence of controlled demolition is overwhelming. As more and more people learn about Building 7, public demand for a new investigation grows. People want the truth.”

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), normal office fires caused the failure of a single column, starting a chain reaction that brought Building 7 down. More than 2,000 architects and engineers have signed the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition that questions NIST’s explanation of the building’s collapse.

“Even the government’s own computer model disproves its theory. It looks nothing like the actual collapse,” said Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer from the Philadelphia area. “Not only that, they refuse to release the data that would allow us to verify their model. In the world of science, this is as bad as it gets. I’m glad most people can look at the collapse and see the obvious.”

The ReThink911 campaign calls for a new investigation into Building 7’s collapse, as well as the destruction of the Twin Towers. The YouGov poll and the ad campaign were financed with more than $225,000 in donations from thousands of supporters.

Visit ReThink911.org to download the full poll results. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1194 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 27th - 29th August 2013. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18+).

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Thomas Potter
|
September 11, 2013
You Won't Find Truth In A Club

The truth is known, but it appears that many people really don’t want to know the truth. They’d rather argue about opinions about rumors while trying to convince themselves that “nobody knows what happened & we’ll never know.” The facts about what happened have been available for many years. There was a paper refuting Steven Jones’ thermite story within a few months of the promotion of his theory but few paid attention. Jones vilified those who spoke the truth & that is all that was needed. Jones claimed the scientific refutation of his thermite story was a personal attack & his followers believed him without even questioning what they were told. Does this sound familiar, à la Bin Laden 9/11 story?

In 2006, Dr. Wood published a paper with Morgan Reynolds documenting the group of holes in WTC6 & WTC5 as well as the major segment of WTC4 along with WTC3 that went missing & the "dustification" of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. But folks were too involved in stoning Dr. Wood to look at the evidence she presented so clearly. That is, most people seem to prefer drama instead of facts. That’s why it’s used so effectively in cover-ups. Few realize that Wood & Reynolds resigned from the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" in August 2006. Then they published the most effective article to date, addressing a huge amount of evidence that still stands un-refuted to this day.

So why didn’t people realize this?

If you remember, pretending to be in a fight with each other over Wood & Reynolds, Jones & Fetzer then launched a new distraction campaign. This had nothing to do with Wood & Reynolds because they had resigned the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" months earlier. But the distraction worked & few looked at the paper Wood & Reynolds published in early October 2006.

What can we learn from this?

The truth was right in front of us all along but manufactured controversy was very effective in distracting people away from the facts. There are people trying to convince us that we know so little & that we’ll never know what happened unless some specified criteria is met to the point of ad nauseam. Why would someone want to divert others away from the truth & try to convince them not to look? This is Déjà vu with Jones playing victim & claiming others have personally attacked him as well as the faux Jones & Fetzer fight to distract people away from the facts. The truth is known & has been known to those looking for it past the cover-up. Dr. Wood’s book has nicely gathered up an enormous amount of evidence. She leads the reader through the evidence while asking them questions to help them see it for themselves. Any honest person who reads that book will know what happened by the time they finish it. No exceptions. So why aren’t people reading her book? Because they prefer to create doubt & suspicion & believe false propaganda & argue about opinions of rumors of hearsay...around & around in circles on forums...instead of simply looking at the facts, just like those running the cover-up have taught them to do.

The question is, will people just continue to marginalize those presenting the truth or will they realized they’ve been duped for 12 years & don’t want to continue being duped by those running the cover-up? Dr. Wood has mostly stood alone through all of this. Why has there been such a far reaching campaign to denigrate her? No one has ever refuted anything she has presented. They’ve only refuted the false propaganda about her & assume they were refuting her work.

Let's learn from this or history will repeat. AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control”? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. If Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

Why is there no Wikipedia page for Dr. Wood but one for Richard Gage that redirects to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

Wikipedia Search Results For Dr. Judy Wood

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search="Dr. Judy Wood"&go=Go

Wikipedia Search Results For Richard Gage (Architect)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Gage_(architect)

Try posting a Wikipedia page for Dr. Judy Wood & see how fast it's deleted!

The truth is known & we had a chance. But well-meaning people who joined the "Truther Movement" were herded up & manipulated into trampling it. Groups are easy to manage & manipulate into being in lockstep with their leader. Sheeple need to leave the herd and read Dr. Wood's book before they are fleeced. You won't find truth in a club.
Joey Moore
|
September 11, 2013
Excellent, Mr. Potter! There is SO much distraction with the clamour about WTC7 and not enough focus on all of the evidence. Dr. Judy Wood will be hailed as HERO in years to come! Truth is no popularity contest. Dr. Wood's work will be borne out in future, as these bamboozlers--Jones, Gage, Fetzer--will all have to fall away, their "theories" having no foundation in reality. Dr. Judy Wood's monumental book, "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy on 9/11" is perfect and complete--as perfect and complete as it is unique! ALL of the evidence is addressed in to to! Thank you for your very thoughtful and thorough comment.
Thomas Potter
|
September 11, 2013
You Won't Find Truth In A Club

The truth is known, but it appears that many people really don’t want to know the truth. They’d rather argue about opinions about rumors while trying to convince themselves that “nobody knows what happened & we’ll never know.” The facts about what happened have been available for many years. There was a paper refuting Steven Jones’ thermite story within a few months of the promotion of his theory but few paid attention. Jones vilified those who spoke the truth & that is all that was needed. Jones claimed the scientific refutation of his thermite story was a personal attack & his followers believed him without even questioning what they were told. Does this sound familiar, à la Bin Laden 9/11 story?

In 2006, Dr. Wood published a paper with Morgan Reynolds documenting the group of holes in WTC6 & WTC5 as well as the major segment of WTC4 along with WTC3 that went missing & the "dustification" of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. But folks were too involved in stoning Dr. Wood to look at the evidence she presented so clearly. That is, most people seem to prefer drama instead of facts. That’s why it’s used so effectively in cover-ups. Few realize that Wood & Reynolds resigned from the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" in August 2006. Then they published the most effective article to date, addressing a huge amount of evidence that still stands un-refuted to this day.

So why didn’t people realize this?

If you remember, pretending to be in a fight with each other over Wood & Reynolds, Jones & Fetzer then launched a new distraction campaign. This had nothing to do with Wood & Reynolds because they had resigned the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" months earlier. But the distraction worked & few looked at the paper Wood & Reynolds published in early October 2006.

What can we learn from this?

The truth was right in front of us all along but manufactured controversy was very effective in distracting people away from the facts. There are people trying to convince us that we know so little & that we’ll never know what happened unless some specified criteria is met to the point of ad nauseam. Why would someone want to divert others away from the truth & try to convince them not to look? This is Déjà vu with Jones playing victim & claiming others have personally attacked him as well as the faux Jones & Fetzer fight to distract people away from the facts. The truth is known & has been known to those looking for it past the cover-up. Dr. Wood’s book has nicely gathered up an enormous amount of evidence. She leads the reader through the evidence while asking them questions to help them see it for themselves. Any honest person who reads that book will know what happened by the time they finish it. No exceptions. So why aren’t people reading her book? Because they prefer to create doubt & suspicion & believe false propaganda & argue about opinions of rumors of hearsay...around & around in circles on forums...instead of simply looking at the facts, just like those running the cover-up have taught them to do.

The question is, will people just continue to marginalize those presenting the truth or will they realized they’ve been duped for 12 years & don’t want to continue being duped by those running the cover-up? Dr. Wood has mostly stood alone through all of this. Why has there been such a far reaching campaign to denigrate her? No one has ever refuted anything she has presented. They’ve only refuted the false propaganda about her & assume they were refuting her work.

Let's learn from this or history will repeat. AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control”? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. If Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

Why is there no Wikipedia page for Dr. Wood but one for Richard Gage that redirects to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

Wikipedia Search Results For Dr. Judy Wood

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search="Dr. Judy Wood"&go=Go

Wikipedia Search Results For Richard Gage (Architect)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Gage_(architect)

Try posting a Wikipedia page for Dr. Judy Wood & see how fast it's deleted!

The truth is known & we had a chance. But well-meaning people who joined the "Truther Movement" were herded up & manipulated into trampling it. Groups are easy to manage & manipulate into being in lockstep with their leader. Sheeple need to leave the herd and read Dr. Wood's book before they are fleeced. You won't find truth in a club.